Exploring Scholarly Platforms for Graduate Medical Education

bgohre3
5 days ago
4 min read

Exploring Scholarly Platforms for Graduate Medical Education: How Program Administrators Can Empower Trainees

As program administrators, coordinators, and managers in Graduate Medical Education (GME), we play a pivotal role in shaping the next generation of physicians. One key aspect of this responsibility is fostering scholarly activity among our trainees—residents and fellows who are not only honing clinical skills but also contributing to the advancement of medical knowledge. Scholarly pursuits, such as research, publications, presentations, and quality improvement projects, are essential for professional development and are mandated by accrediting bodies like the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). In this blog post for FULGME, we'll explore various scholarly platforms tailored to GME and discuss practical strategies for how we can support our trainees in leveraging these resources to enhance their scholarly output.

The Importance of Scholarly Activity in GME

Scholarly activity isn't just a checkbox for accreditation—it's a cornerstone of lifelong learning and evidence-based practice. According to ACGME Common Program Requirements, programs must create an environment that encourages residents and fellows to engage in scholarship, with at least 50% of trainees participating in activities like grand rounds, peer-reviewed publications, or conference presentations. This not only meets institutional standards but also boosts trainees' career prospects, such as fellowship placements and academic positions.

For program leaders, supporting scholarly activity means allocating resources, providing mentorship, and integrating these pursuits into the demanding residency schedule. Research shows that structured initiatives, like dedicated curricula or research committees, significantly increase trainee publications and engagement. By guiding trainees toward effective platforms, we can demystify the process and make scholarship more accessible and rewarding.

Key Scholarly Platforms for GME Trainees

A wealth of platforms exists to support scholarly work in GME, ranging from databases for literature review to journals for publication and tools for collaboration. Here's a curated overview, categorized for ease:

1. Research Databases and Search Engines

PubMed and Google Scholar: Essential starting points for literature searches. PubMed, focused on biomedical literature, is ideal for evidence-based reviews, while Google Scholar offers broader access, including citations and metrics. Encourage trainees to set up alerts for relevant topics to stay current.
Scopus and CORE: Scopus provides comprehensive citation tracking, useful for impact analysis, and CORE aggregates open-access papers, making it budget-friendly for resource-limited programs.

2. Publication and Submission Platforms

Journal of Graduate Medical Education (JGME): An open-access journal from the ACGME, perfect for GME-specific topics like educational innovations and resident perspectives. All articles are free, promoting wide dissemination.
MedEdPORTAL: Hosted by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), this platform features peer-reviewed educational resources, such as curricula and teaching tools, tailored for medical educators and trainees.
BMC Medical Education: An open-access journal that welcomes articles on training healthcare professionals, including GME innovations.
Graduate Medical Education Research Journal (GMERJ): A resident-focused journal for publishing high-quality scholarly work, available in print and online.

3. Collaboration and Networking Tools

ResearchGate and Academia.edu: These social platforms allow trainees to share preprints, connect with peers, and track citations. They're great for building a professional network and collaborating on multi-institutional projects.
ORCID: A must-have for unique researcher identifiers, helping trainees maintain a digital portfolio of their work across platforms.
SciSpace: An AI-powered tool for academic research, offering summaries, data extraction, and a notebook for notes—ideal for busy residents and fellows.

4. Specialized GME Resources

HCA Healthcare Scholarly Commons: Collects and publishes GME community work, supporting diverse academic outputs.
FULGME Forum: Our own platform for sharing GME best practices and innovative ideas, emphasizing administrative scholarship.
Social Media Platforms like X (formerly Twitter): Useful for disseminating research, networking, and staying updated on trends, though effects on residency education are mixed. Tools like Notion can help organize scholarly notes and projects.

These platforms vary in cost (many are free or open-access), making them adaptable to different program budgets.

Strategies for Program Leaders to Support Trainees

As GME professionals, we can bridge the gap between trainees' ambitions and these platforms through targeted support:

Mentorship and Training: Implement mentoring programs where faculty guide trainees on platform navigation and project development. Toolkits like those for resident scholarly activity can provide resources for faculty to build robust research programs. Offer workshops on using tools like PubMed or submitting to JGME.
Resource Allocation: Dedicate protected time for scholarly work, as recommended by ACGME, and provide access to institutional subscriptions or e-learning platforms like the one developed by the University of Michigan for grant writing. Partner with libraries for training on reference managers like Mendeley or Zotero.
Structured Initiatives: Create research committees or "scholarly activity days" to showcase trainee work. Systematic reviews highlight that curricula focused on scholarly skills increase publications. Use frameworks like the Statewide Campus System for community-based GME to plan developmental projects.
Tracking and Visibility: Integrate scholarly metrics into program evaluations and make achievements visible on residency websites to attract applicants. Encourage ORCID profiles to track progress.
Addressing Barriers: For time-constrained trainees, promote quick-win platforms like preprints on medRxiv or AI-assisted tools for literature reviews. Foster inclusivity by supporting underrepresented groups through targeted funding or collaborations.

Examples from successful programs include the University of Colorado's requirement for residents to produce projects with dedicated mentoring, and HCA's commons for sharing diverse outputs.

Conclusion: Building a Culture of Scholarship

By exploring and integrating these scholarly platforms, we as program administrators can transform scholarly activity from a requirement into a fulfilling pursuit for our trainees. Start small—perhaps by hosting a platform demo session or linking trainees with mentors—and watch as engagement grows. Ultimately, empowering residents and fellows in this way not only complies with ACGME standards but also contributes to better patient care and innovation in medicine.

Share your experiences in the FULGME forum, and let's continue the conversation on supporting the scholars of tomorrow!